<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right To Argue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philmckinney.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html</link>
	<description>Unleash personal creativity, ingenuity and innovation by asking better questions leading to killer ideas resulting in killer innovations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:36:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary Lamont</title>
		<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html/comment-page-1#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killeringenuity.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html#comment-630</guid>
		<description>My thought on disagreeing with my &quot;chain of command&quot; is this:
People cannot make a good decision without all the information pertaining to that decision, including  my viewpoint! However, disagreement AFTER the decision is made is simply being disagreeable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought on disagreeing with my &#8220;chain of command&#8221; is this:<br />
People cannot make a good decision without all the information pertaining to that decision, including  my viewpoint! However, disagreement AFTER the decision is made is simply being disagreeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Todhunter</title>
		<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>James Todhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killeringenuity.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Managers who do not encourage open dialogue are limiting the value of their team.  Team members who don’t voice opposing views are denying their management potentially valuable insights.  Strong managers respect those who contribute constructively expressed viewpoints.  As Einstein said, “Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managers who do not encourage open dialogue are limiting the value of their team.  Team members who don’t voice opposing views are denying their management potentially valuable insights.  Strong managers respect those who contribute constructively expressed viewpoints.  As Einstein said, “Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Peters</title>
		<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html/comment-page-1#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killeringenuity.com/archives/2007/04/the-right-to-argue.html#comment-628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been on both sides - when I managed a team in India I used to get so frustrated that they wouldn&#039;t &quot;argue&quot; with me.  I used to tell them, I&#039;m not necessarily the expert here, feel free to disagree!
On the other hand though, once you&#039;ve argued your point, it&#039;s time to move on even if your point wasn&#039;t considered important enough to change the final decision.  I&#039;ve seen people get bad reputations by continuing to argue a point long after a decision has been made.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on both sides &#8211; when I managed a team in India I used to get so frustrated that they wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;argue&#8221; with me.  I used to tell them, I&#8217;m not necessarily the expert here, feel free to disagree!<br />
On the other hand though, once you&#8217;ve argued your point, it&#8217;s time to move on even if your point wasn&#8217;t considered important enough to change the final decision.  I&#8217;ve seen people get bad reputations by continuing to argue a point long after a decision has been made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
