<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: Interview with Chuck House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philmckinney.com/archives/2009/10/podcast-interview-with-chuck-house.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2009/10/podcast-interview-with-chuck-house.html</link>
	<description>Unleash personal creativity, ingenuity and innovation by asking better questions leading to killer ideas resulting in killer innovations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:47:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zerman</title>
		<link>http://philmckinney.com/archives/2009/10/podcast-interview-with-chuck-house.html/comment-page-1#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killeringenuity.com/archives/2009/10/podcast-interview-with-chuck-house.html#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Hi again,

Just another thought RE: &quot;Testing of Site&quot;.

I downloaded the PDF of the Chuck House interview, being aware of him and some of his prior history.

After reading the interview transcript, I wondered, rhetorically, whether a slightly more focussed intro to the write-offs could have been produced, as these snippets are used in at least two places on the site to induce downloads of either the podcast or the transcript.

For example, in place of &quot;In this episode of the Killer Innovations podcast I interview Chuck House. Chuck is one of those individuals whose impact we’ve all felt but didn’t immediately realize....&quot;

Perhaps a more &quot;grabby&quot; intro would be:

&quot;I interview Chuck House, inventor of display technology used in moon landings and recipient of HP&#039;s &quot;Medal of Defiance&quot; about travelling in the HP Greyhound TestBench bus, PLUS ...&quot;

Just some thinkings on a warm Sunday morning (35C/95F) in Adelaide, Australia.

Regards,

Michael Zerman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again,</p>
<p>Just another thought RE: &#8220;Testing of Site&#8221;.</p>
<p>I downloaded the PDF of the Chuck House interview, being aware of him and some of his prior history.</p>
<p>After reading the interview transcript, I wondered, rhetorically, whether a slightly more focussed intro to the write-offs could have been produced, as these snippets are used in at least two places on the site to induce downloads of either the podcast or the transcript.</p>
<p>For example, in place of &#8220;In this episode of the Killer Innovations podcast I interview Chuck House. Chuck is one of those individuals whose impact we’ve all felt but didn’t immediately realize&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps a more &#8220;grabby&#8221; intro would be:</p>
<p>&#8220;I interview Chuck House, inventor of display technology used in moon landings and recipient of HP&#8217;s &#8220;Medal of Defiance&#8221; about travelling in the HP Greyhound TestBench bus, PLUS &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Just some thinkings on a warm Sunday morning (35C/95F) in Adelaide, Australia.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Michael Zerman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
