Skip to content

What drives that fear that kills innovation?

Innovations are rejected for how they make make people feel long before they are reviewed on their merits.  Why is it?  Any new idea solicits a reaction from the people who are in decision path to approve and fund the development.  The most common of emotions is fear. Fear is an interesting emotion.

Phil McKinney
Phil McKinney
2 min read
What drives that fear that kills innovation?

Innovations are rejected for how they make make people feel long before they are reviewed on their merits.  Why is it?  Any new idea solicits a reaction from the people who are in decision path to approve and fund the development.  The most common of emotions is fear.

Fear is an interesting emotion.  It elicits either the “fight” or “flight” response.  In the case of rejecting an idea with the “fight” response, the reaction is typically to attach the idea (won't work, I have a better idea, etc).  For the “flight” response, the reaction is to downplay the idea based on risk or impact (the impact is too small to move the needle, its to radical of a change for us, etc).

Where most innovators fail is they attempt to come up with answers to the rejection (why the idea will work, why its not such a radical idea, etc) rather than recognizing and addressing the emotion that is driving the rejection.  If a key person has a strong fear response to your idea, it is doomed.

What drives the fear of innovation?

  • Ego – I won't support an idea that I didn't come up with.
  • Corporate Politics – We will look bad since this is our area of responsibility.
  • Security — I've worked hard to get where I'm at and this is risky.  I could loose everything.
  • Success/Change – We are doing great with what we have.  Why would we want to change?

So what should you do?  Develop strategies to address the fear before the rejection.  For example, if ego is the anticipated reaction, get key individuals involved early so they can “claim” ownership.  If the response is corporate politics, have the leaders who have significant influence on the decision get involved and then present the idea so they get viewed as providing mentorship to the idea.

Is this dishonest or misleading?  No.  In my experience, when you get key leaders involved early, they typically buy in since you've asked for their input. Use this involvement to share the credit rather than blaming management for the rejection because you believe they “don't get it”.

Let's be honest, its not just “others” who exhibit fear.  We all do depending on our individual roles and circumstances when it comes to evaluating ideas.

Remember, recognize the fear and address the emotion rather than the rejection.

Most important of all, resist the fear when evaluating at new ideas.  You could be the problem.

Blogcorporate politicsegofearInnovation

Phil McKinney Twitter

Phil McKinney is an innovator, podcaster, author, and speaker. He is the retired CTO of HP. Phil's book, Beyond The Obvious, shares his expertise and lessons learned on innovation and creativity.

Comments


Related Posts

Members Public

Innovation Debt: The Comfort Zone Trap

Why do organizations march in circles like army ants, even when it leads to their doom? The hidden cost of innovation debt goes far beyond efficiency - it rewires corporate DNA, turning the comfort zone into a cage. Breaking free starts with a simple question: why?

Innovation Debt: The Comfort Zone Trap
Members Public

Fear Steals Your Best Ideas

Fear isn't just an emotion - it's secretly sabotaging your success. Discover the real-world cost of playing it safe and learn practical ways to stop fear from killing your best ideas. Warning: This article might make you actually do that thing you've been putting off.

Fear Steals Your Best Ideas
Members Public

Too Big to Fail? Think Again

It is dangerous to believe that an organization is immune to failure because of its size. Historical evidence proves that size and market dominance are no safeguards against failure. Success is earned by adaptability, innovation, and a relentless commitment to meeting changing demands.

Too Big to Fail? Think Again